For example, PBS has called for exception for non-profit broadcasters and warned that its stations could stop streaming services into Canada:ĬRTC regulation could also inadvertently cause PBS member stations to have to withdraw online streaming offerings from Canada if making them available becomes unduly burdensome on stations’ very limited resources, thereby hindering the stations’ ability to provide their educational public service to their local communities. In addition to seeking exceptions, some services are warning the CRTC that the regulatory framework may cause them to stop streaming into Canada altogether. My post yesterday on the CRTC’s Bill C-11 consultations ( my submission here) focused on the numerous demands for new exceptions covering everything from adult content to fitness apps.
This notably includes mainstream streamers such as PBS and niche services such as AMC’s ALLWAYSBLK. With the CRTC’s Bill C-11 consultations now underway, foreign streamers are warning that they may block services from Canada or reduce the scope of their content libraries due to the regulatory requirements or burden. The net effect – contrary to government claims – would be to impact what Canadians could watch. While Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez claimed it would lead to increased choice (a claim he re-iterated this week in Banff), critics of the bill argued that the opposite was true, namely that the bill would likely lead to fewer services entering the Canadian market or streamers reducing content choices. The Bill C-11 process featured a marked divide on the implications for consumer choice.
0 kommentar(er)
